Yes nginx is my favourite too, being from czech republic, we are closer to russia :-) ... but it really requires stable build of uwsgi for windows not only some home-made. Would appreciate hearing any results ...
Dne pátek, 15. března 2013 14:27:03 UTC+1 Niphlod napsal(a): > > I assume there aren't, but that is not a setup I'd put up for an intranet > to publish an app used by 50 users. > Apache on unix is somewhat "fatty" , on windows it gets really soon to > "unbereable". Config directives are a sysadmin thing (I'm not against it, > it just doesn't feel natural). That being said, we're all happy with apache > because it's battle tested and sooner or later someone had to wrestle with > it, and became a familiar "tool in our belt". > But, the burden of maintenance started to be too heavy, and that's why I > switched some time ago from apache to nginx (ease of maintenance + lighter > on resources) and adopted uwsgi as soon as it got out (with more and more > features added at every release). > > Now that uwsgi is getting "stronger" on being directly on the "public > face" of things (i.e. has a own http mode, it eventually serves static > files, has HTTPS, etc etc etc), I'd go for uwsgi on Windows all the times, > and on Unix I'll keep putting it "behind" nginx just when the traffic hits > "sky-rocket limits". Of course, it's just a matter or personal preference. > > > On Friday, March 15, 2013 1:20:36 PM UTC+1, David Marko wrote: >> >> Are there issues with using(on Windows) Apache HTTP + mod_wsgi see the >> windows builds here http://www.lfd.uci.edu/~gohlke/pythonlibs/#mod_wsgi ? > > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
