We will not do the mistake Python made: break backward compatibility and not make it worthwhile.
We are already working on web3py. It is on github. You can already help us port it to python 3.0. yet the which will be worthwile. better internal logic, better helpers, better forms, etc. Once that is done we can backport to web2py. There is no point to port code before we improve it. Massimo On Saturday, 13 April 2013 09:20:48 UTC-5, samuel bonilla wrote: > > I have a proposal called 'web2py +' which is to give support to python > 3.x, is the same code but support is for python 3.x, 'web2py plus' is for > developers who want to migrate to python 3.x > > is only a proposal, I have not started work, I want to hear comments about > it .... > > thanks... > > > El viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 19:51:23 UTC-5, [email protected]ó: >> >> Hi, >> I'm interested (very interested) in a Python web framework that works >> with Python 3.x (3.3+, in particular). What is the status of web2py's py3 >> support? I found a late-2011 thread in this group where Massimo was betting >> that there would be a Python 2.8 and hence no pressing need to even care >> about 3.x. Me, I have no interest in 2.y, and if web2py doesn't support the >> current and in fact better version of Python then I will reluctantly have >> to look elsewhere. >> Thanks in advance, >> -- B >> >> -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
