-1 on the patch.
I don't really get it. Why do you (and all of us) need yet another
attribute (too many already) of the Field when we have widget= for it ?
Is it really that hard to do
def my_string_widget(field, value):
return INPUT(_name=field.name, _id="%s_%s" % (field._tablename,
field.name),
_class="whatever",
_value=value,
_required=""
requires=field.requires)
Field('comment', 'string', widget=my_string_widget)
that enables you to do all sorts of crazy things with your own widget ?!
On Sunday, August 25, 2013 4:36:45 PM UTC+2, mr.freeze wrote:
>
> Thanks Anthony. This is good for a specific use case but my patch would
> allow for arbitrary modification of a field's default widget output. I
> think this could be generally useful.
>
> On Sunday, August 25, 2013 9:04:20 AM UTC-5, Anthony wrote:
>>
>> Check out http://dev.s-cubism.com/plugin_notemptymarker.
>>
>> Anthony
>>
>
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
