I just discovered that dictform and smartdictform override my "requires"
and add their own, based on the type of the Field. It somewhat defeats the
purpose of having a custom widget.
-- Joe
On Sunday, August 25, 2013 7:51:30 AM UTC-7, Niphlod wrote:
>
> -1 on the patch.
>
> I don't really get it. Why do you (and all of us) need yet another
> attribute (too many already) of the Field when we have widget= for it ?
> Is it really that hard to do
>
> def my_string_widget(field, value):
> return INPUT(_name=field.name, _id="%s_%s" % (field._tablename,
> field.name),
> _class="whatever",
> _value=value,
> _required=""
> requires=field.requires)
>
> Field('comment', 'string', widget=my_string_widget)
>
> that enables you to do all sorts of crazy things with your own widget ?!
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sunday, August 25, 2013 4:36:45 PM UTC+2, mr.freeze wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Anthony. This is good for a specific use case but my patch would
>> allow for arbitrary modification of a field's default widget output. I
>> think this could be generally useful.
>>
>> On Sunday, August 25, 2013 9:04:20 AM UTC-5, Anthony wrote:
>>>
>>> Check out http://dev.s-cubism.com/plugin_notemptymarker.
>>>
>>> Anthony
>>>
>>
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
