Hello,
I'm testing both gunicorn and uwsgi with web2py on my (production) server with nginx acting as front-end/reverse-proxy. Deploying of gunicorn is pure simplicity which I like (it reminds me on webpy) and I can access web2py's admin via https, while having problem to do the same with uwsgi. │ My sites are and, after converting to web2py, will be small/low-traffic and can raise to medium/medium-traffic in the future, while on my hosting (ala webfaction) I have limit on the total memory used by apps to 512MB and number of procs is 50. Any idea which WSGI server behave better in such constrained environment? uWSGI certainly looks as very powerful, but maybe it is an overkill for our needs and brings more trouble with configuration comparing it with simple deployment via gunicorn? Sincerely, Gour -- He is a perfect yogī who, by comparison to his own self, sees the true equality of all beings, in both their happiness and their distress, O Arjuna! http://www.atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810 -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
