+1: I really don't see the issue with uwsgi configs . Il giorno mercoledì 2 ottobre 2013 15:16:23 UTC+2, Roberto De Ioris ha scritto: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I'm testing both gunicorn and uwsgi with web2py on my (production) > > server with nginx acting as front-end/reverse-proxy. Deploying of > > gunicorn is pure simplicity which I like (it reminds me on webpy) and I > > can access web2py's admin via https, while having problem to do the same > > with uwsgi. > > │ > > My sites are and, after converting to web2py, will be small/low-traffic > > and can raise to medium/medium-traffic in the future, while on my > > hosting (ala webfaction) I have limit on the total memory used by apps > > to 512MB and number of procs is 50. > > > > Any idea which WSGI server behave better in such constrained > > environment? > > > > uWSGI certainly looks as very powerful, but maybe it is an overkill for > > our needs and brings more trouble with configuration comparing it with > > simple deployment via gunicorn? > > > > > > While the "complexity" of uWSGI in latest times is questionable > (documentation improved a lot and the quickstart introduce to basically > everything you need), i always suggest newcomers to go pure-python > (rocket, gunicorn, flup...) as compilation can be a problem sometimes. > > The problem is that once you start placing apps in constrained > environments, you will soon start to face low-level problems (dealing with > rss, address space, monitoring), something uWSGI is optimized for (for > example you can tell it to reboot after a memory limit is reached and so > on) > > In addition to this uWSGI uses lot less memory and supports threading that > when you have few resources is a good approach for increasing concurrency. > > The "overkill" definition is really funny (you are not the first person > saying it) becase generally uWSGI has hundreds more features than > "competitors" but it is the one consuming less resources :) > > And just as a note (from the web2py directory, after having copied > wsgihandler.py from the handlers directory): > > gunicorn --bind :9090 wsgihandler > > uwsgi --http-socket :9090 --wsgi wsgihandler > > is it so different ;) ? > > -- > Roberto De Ioris > http://unbit.it >
-- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
