I very much agree with this. How do you propose we do it? On Wednesday, 5 August 2015 17:37:19 UTC-5, Limedrop wrote: > > I hesitate to comment on this as it's one of those topics were there's not > "one obvious way to do it" (obviously I'm not Dutch). Essentially, I think > google groups does an okay job and the benefits of any change are likely to > be outweighed by the heavy cost of that change. > > Having said that, I've always thought that we're missing a trick by not > integrating forum questions with the web2py book. Imagine having > medium.com-style side comments with the book, making it more of a living > document. Questions and answers would be right next to the relevant section > of the book, providing further explanation and reducing RTFM answers. I > guess you'd also add a better search facility, a stack-overflow style > 'homepage' and possibly a slight re-structure of the book sections. Ask a > question and it gets tagged to a book section. The book is already built > with auth.wiki() - so we would be adding to functionality/infrastructure > that has to be maintained anyway. > > We can always dream ;-) > >
-- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
