Why not just (IS_)STRONGPWD (or pwdstrength) ? That's what it is, isn't it ?
On Jun 18, 2:49 pm, "mr.freeze" <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry guys, didn't even think about the python complex number object. > > Perhaps just COMPLEXITY? So you could say: > db.mytable.passwd.requires=[COMPLEXITY(),CRYPT()] > > I too doubt that anyone has put this into use except me. > > On Jun 18, 3:17 am, Iceberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Interesting. > > > I fully understand and like the backward-compatible policy of web2py. > > But in this case, in this moment, I assume there aren't many people > > download 1.64.2 yet, and only Mr. Freeze is using the IS_COMPLEX. So, > > it is not too late now to change it to a more proper name. Otherwise, > > I think the ambiguous even misleading name could be an issue in long > > term. > > > Just my $0.02 > > > On Jun18, 1:37pm, mdipierro <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Good point but now it made it into stable. I doubt this will be an > > > issue. > > > > On Jun 18, 12:15 am, Markus Gritsch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Well, IS_COMPLEX is not a good name since Python has a complex > > > > datatype: e.g. 3+5j and one could assume it is tested for this. > > > > > Markus --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
