It returns a bool, right? So I strongly vote for the 'IS_' prefix, whatever else is decided. As for the rest, I initially preferred IS_STRONGPWD, because even when I saw the argument list I still didn't know what it's purpose would be. But someone else in this thread said it could be usable for things besides passwords (encryption keys, I assume), so I guess IS_STRONG is the better choice.
On Jun 18, 8:43 am, DenesL <[email protected]> wrote: > First of all, thanks for sharing the validator, it might come in handy > in the future. > I must agree on the name change and that now is the right time to do > it. > > IS_STRONG() feels like a good choice since it will be checking > password strength, which is a function of length, complexity and > randomness (only the first two are being validated here, the latter > requires a check against well-know and last-used passwords). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
