I diasagree too. I need a web2py helpdesk.
If enough user community is attracted to web2py + GAE, I can get my helpdesk built. Also as an architect of the language Massimo, the focus should be; 1. Documentation 2. Attracting developers to web2py 3. After the founder scenario - Creating a community / Foundation like Debian A one man dictating, i need "estore + cms" out of the blue, seems plain silly. We can take a lot of good things from Jquery, Debian etc Thanks On Jul 11, 5:48 pm, JohnMc <[email protected]> wrote: > Joe -- > > I disagree as well. Even though I have said more than once docs are a > weak point. But it is being addressed. Might I suggest, Massimo > released 3 chapters of the new book. Have you reviewed them and > possibly sent in corrections? Proof's in the pudding. > > Yarko, rest -- > > Want something focused, gets out the kinks on process and has > something to show for it in the end process? > > Why not turn the editorial proofing of the V2 of the book into a > series of sprints? If nothing else it will validate the 'process' for > everything else going forward. If Massimo approves, its his IP. > > As to projects to tackle. I see nothing wrong with either CMS, Wiki, > or eStore. If you ran these suggestions thru a UML you will end up > with some constituent subcomponents. > > * editor come tag tool. Ends up being common to all three. > * intelligent storage. A means to properly categorize content, filter > it, sort it in a common way. Maybe an XPath like metaphor higher level > than the DAL for most common searches? DAL directly for more > sophisticated queries. Common to CMS, Wiki, Blog and catalog > descriptions in an eStore. > * Calendar function. An iCal based engine plus a base level class for > display. Common to CMS, Wiki, Blog. > * Workflow engine. Leverage off the cron functionality but extend it > to trigger tasks in sequence and in parallel as the work flow > dictates. Tasks would validate predecessors are complete. Common in > CMS, eStore. > > With those subcomponents in hand tackling the higher level projects > start with around 50% of the work already done -- once. This also > gives those interested exposure to these tools before launching a > larger project. > > JohnMc > > On Jul 11, 11:34 am, Joe Barnhart <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I think its a complete diversion of effort and a waste of time. > > > The reason we don't have meaningful apps on web2py is because nobody > > can figure out how to use it. The documentation SUCKS. Hello??!? > > Haven't we had this discussion endless times already? > > > We are the same group who couldn't create our own WIKI in web2py so we > > could have a PLACE for documentation. Instead of fixing the wiki > > we're going to hike the banners and storm the walls of other platforms > > by doing our own CMS? > > > We need cohesive documentation so we can grow the pool of web2py > > users. Useful meaningful applications will come if we have a user > > community with depth. Which we DON'T at present. > > > -- Joe Barnhart > > > On Jul 10, 1:32 pm, mdipierro <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I think we need to build two task forces. > > > > 1) to build a CMS > > > > 2) to build a eStore > > > > the more overlap the better. We need two project leaders and > > > volunteers. I also suggest starting by creating google docs to gather > > > requirements. > > > > Lots of people needs these, including me. > > > > Massimo --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
