On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Tim Michelsen <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > I would agree with 'use YOUR tools' philosophy. The fact the entire > > web2py community is spread across Win/Mac/Linux assures that in a > > physical sense. I have read the Sphinx docs, tussled with some simple > > markup and gotten resultant output. Its like futzing with another > > dialect of Wiki markup in my mind. The output side of Sphinx is > > elegant. But the creation side is its weak link right now. But that is > > not only Sphinx's problem, but the case with most markup formats. A > > Sphinx DTD for OpenOffice would go a long way to solving that > > problem. > GSoC will soon have the foundation for interactive Sphinx stuff: > http://gminick.wordpress.com/2009/07/11/mid-term-summary/ > > Good that they work with mercurial which is inteded for web2py, too. Thanks for this link; I've looked at this project. It's more-or-less keeping up to date w/ Sphinx (which I don't think matters too terribly) At this point, it looks to be a writer addition, adding a thing called a "webapp" which for now tries to add comments to paragraph id's (not unlike what the django book project does). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
