FWIW, as a relatively new user of web2py, I'm much less interested in
HOWTO tutorials (Massimo's manual is quite good!) than in being able
to try and download example applications that are well-commented and
"close enough" to what I want to create that I can easily modify them
one step at time to move toward a finished product.

Just my $0.02,
Mike

On Jul 19, 8:03 pm, Tim Michelsen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I would agree with 'use YOUR tools' philosophy. The fact the entire
> > web2py community is spread across Win/Mac/Linux assures that in a
> > physical sense.  I have read the Sphinx docs, tussled with some simple
> > markup and gotten resultant output. Its like futzing with another
> > dialect of Wiki markup in my mind. The output side of Sphinx is
> > elegant. But the creation side is its weak link right now. But that is
> > not only Sphinx's problem, but the case with most markup formats. A
> > Sphinx DTD for OpenOffice would go a long way to solving that
> > problem.
>
> GSoC will soon have the foundation for interactive Sphinx 
> stuff:http://gminick.wordpress.com/2009/07/11/mid-term-summary/
>
> Good that they work with mercurial which is inteded for web2py, too.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to