+1 Really bad idea. I have never seen even a shadow of reason for this. We trust Massimo with his declaration. Please, try to understand. This is about serious production environments, important applications and making money using web2py. We could consider it if there was a real need. But there is none.
On Aug 4, 2009 9:00 PM, "Fran" <[email protected]> wrote: On Aug 4, 7:30 pm, Pynthon <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah maybe a complete web2py 2 rewrite. W... I believe this is a bad idea as we really don't want to break existing apps - this is a *key* strength of web2py & one many of it's adherents really value. This is what justifies the term 'Enterprise'. Many of the 'issues' are easy to solve without doing so & the rest are pretty much design decisions. They are seen as key strengths for some & key weaknesses for others. Let those who see them as strengths enjoy this & if others cannot live with what they see as weaknesses, let them choose from the many other frameworks out there. F --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are s... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
