I am sorry that I did not comment as well. I took a look when you originally posted, and I like it. I didn't comment because I do not use BEAUTIFY.
I really do like the recursive, +1 for me, but only as another option to the current beautify not a replacement. -Thadeus On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 7:57 PM, villas <[email protected]> wrote: > On Feb 17, 12:07 am, John Heenan <[email protected]> wrote: >> No reaction to including a four line big productivity booster into >> web2py! > > Hi John, > Sorry no one commented! At least I looked at it, and liked it. But > Beautify is only a prototyping & testing thing for most so it's making > something prettier that no one will see. But it's still better, so why > not? +1 > David > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "web2py-users" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.
