I will say this, it is alot better, because you can hardly even tell it is a prototyping table, it could in certain situations pass for production quality :)
-Thadeus On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Thadeus Burgess <[email protected]> wrote: > I am sorry that I did not comment as well. > > I took a look when you originally posted, and I like it. I didn't > comment because I do not use BEAUTIFY. > > I really do like the recursive, +1 for me, but only as another option > to the current beautify not a replacement. > > -Thadeus > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 7:57 PM, villas <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Feb 17, 12:07 am, John Heenan <[email protected]> wrote: >>> No reaction to including a four line big productivity booster into >>> web2py! >> >> Hi John, >> Sorry no one commented! At least I looked at it, and liked it. But >> Beautify is only a prototyping & testing thing for most so it's making >> something prettier that no one will see. But it's still better, so why >> not? +1 >> David >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "web2py-users" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en. >> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.
