On May 6, 1:47 pm, Thadeus Burgess <[email protected]> wrote:
> Extend will effectively make the template its parent in the tree.
>
> Include will parse the template, and take its response and stick it in
> the tree at that point.
>
> An included file does not have access to its parents blocks, because
> it is effectively become part of the original template. So an include
> file cannot override any blocks.
Ok, I see.
Would it be an error (then) to include a file which contains an
{{extend}}? Does that make sense?
... lots to think about.... I do not think we want to get into
namespaces for templates (at least not implicitly).
... have to think more; keep raising these points (I have to get on
to other things for today, but will look back here later).
- Yarko
>
> --
> Thadeus
>
> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Yarko Tymciurak
>
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > s for the old reverse-include, i.e. unnamed: {{include}} --- I
> > have squarely aimed at killing that beast, making it go away, so yes -
> > my entire point is to elimin
