Yup... the software I create with web2py is stricty internal anyway. They honestly would fire me if it looked too good. I would be wasting there money. :P Best Regards, Jason
On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 11:30 -0500, Thadeus Burgess wrote: > One thing I have noticed is django and RoR is for the most part, a > designer oriented community. IE: Lots of designers, few real > programmers/engineers, this is why you see design-oriented keywords > floating around in those frameworks. Most of us here in the web2py > community are programmers/engineers/physicists, etc... we don't have > the best design skills, even if we are brilliant =) > > -- > Thadeus > > > > > > On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Alexei Vinidiktov > <alexei.vinidik...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Anthony <av201...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > [...] > > > >> From what I've read, web2py sounds like a great framework -- > >> comprehensive, well-integrated, easy to set up, learn, and deploy, > >> etc. However, although it sounds good on paper, I haven't yet found a > >> single site built with web2py that looks all that impressive (at least > >> superficially). It's easy to find quite a number of sophisticated and > >> impressive looking sites/apps built with Ruby on Rails and Django, but > >> I haven't seen anything remotely comparable based on web2py. I'm > >> wondering why the disparity. > > > > What you've seen on those sites is the façade. It's the work of > > graphic designers and not a merit of the underlying frameworks. That's > > what you see. > > > > I'm sure the same effect can be achieved with any web2py based > > website. You just need to hire a great graphic designer and usability > > expert. > > > > -- > > Alexei Vinidiktov > >
