On Jun 14, 2010, at 8:40 PM, Richard wrote: > would that go against the web2py philosophy of having no configuration > files?
Not really. It could go in routes.py, which already (potentially) exists. > > > On Jun 15, 1:33 pm, Thadeus Burgess <[email protected]> wrote: >> Why can't we configure the default name of 'init' ? >
