So, what's happening with the voting method? As already discussed at length, the one-vote-per-person method isn't a good idea with so many entries (particularly with sets of similar logos). For example, #5 and #17 are probably splitting votes.
We really should implement one of the other suggested methods: * Approval Voting (vote for as many logos as you want): Probably the easiest to implement, and should handle the "clone" problem. (Still need the ability to change one's vote(s)). * Ratings: Though for this to work, either everyone has to rate every logo, or for each voter, each un-rated logo has to be assigned the lowest possible value (e.g., 1 star). * Ranking: Preferably using the Schulze method for tallying. Probably the most complex to implement. If we're not going to do any of the above, then at the very least, we should go back to showing the _number_ of votes for each logo (no need to show the names -- they should remain anonymous). That way, at least we could see if we are splitting (and possibly wasting) our votes and then shift our support to a logo we like that has a chance of winning. If we stick with the current voting method, with 50+ logos, we could easily end up with a "winner" that gets the support of only a small percentage of the voters. Also, is the voting deadline still Oct. 19? Thanks. Anthony On Oct 13, 5:17 pm, Bruno Rocha <[email protected]> wrote: > Martin Mulone made the logovote application. > > I am hosting at my server > > You can post logo ideas, and vote for you prefered logo. > > Better if you made an transparent canvas .gif or .png maximum 250x70 > > Maximum of 10 uploads per user, Just one vote per user. > > Take a look:http://blouweb.com/logovote/
