Love the new welcome app design.
Instead of developing flash further how about just using jgrowl instead. > It requires downloading 3 more files and the advantages are minimal. I think the advantages are worthwhile and the extra files do not matter if they are stored in sub-folders to avoid clutter. On Nov 4, 5:27 am, mdipierro <[email protected]> wrote: > One thing we can do is a FLASH helper that allows: > > response.flash=flash('test',mode='warn') > > This is already in the new welcome app but we could promote flash to a > FLASH helper. Pros? Cons? > It would link a helper to some image static files that may not be > there. > > We could add some JS code insider that can reposition it but I do not > think that is a good idea. The position should be fixed and determined > by the CSS. > > Massimo > > On Nov 3, 12:09 pm, rochacbruno <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Would be a good idea to have more options for flash. > > > I.e: response.flash('hello world',position='top-right') > > > Enviado via iPhone > > > Em 03/11/2010, às 14:56, Martín Mulone <[email protected]> escreveu: > > > > Massimo I think welcome is broken in trunk, there no files in views/ :O > > > > Often the user does not notice that something has just appeared in the > > > flash box > > > > Perhaps a variation of flash 'silen', that goes like an application > > > statusbar, on bottom and thin. > > > > 2010/11/3 mdipierro <[email protected]> > > > I think this is fixed and layouts now work with both old welcome and > > > new welcome. > > > > Can somebody try it please? > > > > Just install one random layout (old welcome and new welcome) and use > > > firebug to make sure superfish.js is found. > > > > Massimo > > > > On Nov 3, 4:37 am, Branko Vukelic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 6:00 AM, mdipierro <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > We have two solutions: > > > > > 1) change all layouts w2p files to look for superfish in static/ or in > > > > > static/js > > > > > 2) move all the current static files in static/ and our of static/css, > > > > > static/js, static/images/. > > > > > > Probably 1) is a better option. > > > > > If you can customize it anyway you want in a custom template, I really > > > > see no problem with 1). > > > > > -- > > > > Branko Vukelić > > > > > [email protected] > > > > [email protected] > > > > > Check out my blog:http://www.brankovukelic.com/ > > > > Check out my portfolio:http://www.flickr.com/photos/foxbunny/ > > > > Registered Linux user #438078 (http://counter.li.org/) > > > > I hang out on identi.ca:http://identi.ca/foxbunny > > > > > Gimp Brushmakers Guildhttp://bit.ly/gbg-group > > > > -- > > > My blog:http://martin.tecnodoc.com.ar > > > My portfolio *spanish*:http://www.tecnodoc.com.ar > > > Checkout my last proyect instant-press:http://www.instant2press.com > >
