I am a Pylons user too, at our company the main product is made with Pylons.
We had extra work migrating from 0.9 to Pylons 1.0 because they broke compatibility. After all the months of work, we are now lost with this new change. Even creators saying that Pylons API will be always there, what we can expect for the evolution of our actual work? Maybe we decide to write our own layer for the GeoMaps (actually done with Pylons) and migrate the whole front end from Pylons+WTForms to web2py & DAL The backwards conpatibility compromisse really matters! Em 07/11/2010, às 20:28, Branko Vukelic <[email protected]> escreveu: > On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 5:20 PM, mdipierro <[email protected]> wrote: >> thought you may enjoy this discussion... >> >> http://www.reddit.com/r/Python/comments/e22ol/pyramid_is_a_small_fast_downtoearth_python_web/c14omr0 > > Discussion about the "MV" framework was really interesting, though. > And Massimo is absolutely right in pointing out that intellectual > masturbation is just that: masturbation. It doesn't do anyone any > favors, and as a result you get reactions like "Wait, what am I > missing? Controllers or Templates?" Doesn't do Pyramid devs any > service either. It'll take some time even for devs to get over the > terminology hump, let alone the user. > > When I started using web frameworks 2 years ago (as a non-programmer, > mind you), I had much trouble getting used to MVC. Then I had trouble > wrapping my mind around MTV in Django. I can imagine what it might > look like to existing Pylons users: "What?! No more C?!" :D > > > -- > Branko Vukelić > > [email protected] > [email protected] > > Check out my blog: http://www.brankovukelic.com/ > Check out my portfolio: http://www.flickr.com/photos/foxbunny/ > Registered Linux user #438078 (http://counter.li.org/) > I hang out on identi.ca: http://identi.ca/foxbunny > > Gimp Brushmakers Guild > http://bit.ly/gbg-group
