Yes, "Maybe not as web2py" should be "Maybe not as paranoid as web2py" or just "Maybe not as much as web2py".
A few other typos: - Should be "31 validators" (i.e., plural) - "named after the HTML elements they represent" (i.e., add "the") - "first applications written for the web2py framework" (i.e., add "the") -- or maybe just "first applications written using web2py". - Should be "JSONRPC" not "JSONPRC". Also, I'm wondering about the claim that "Most frameworks are better suited for classic content sites" (rather than "web applications"). Is that really true these days? It seems that most frameworks are described as building "applications" (not just content sites). Maybe "application" is too general or vague in this context. Perhaps the relevant distinction has more to do with facilitating some specific aspects of web app development, like AJAX, web services, GAE, etc. Anthony On Nov 8, 4:19 pm, Stefaan Himpe <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hope you enjoy it. If you guys think it's OK as it is, I'll post a PDF > > version somewhere. > > I spotted a typo "alaready" (from: The age of web applications has > alaready started...and web2py is there) > > The sentence "Maybe not as web2py." sounds a bit weird to me (but I'm > not a native English speaker - so perhaps that's just me; I would have > expected something like: "Maybe not as paranoid as web2py."). > > Other than that it looks really marvelous! > Well done. > > (Btw I like the gray background - it occurred to me that perhaps a > similar background might also look good in the admin app, which now > looks a bit "white" to my eyes.) > > Best regards, > Stefaan.
