On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Anthony <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, "Maybe not as web2py" should be "Maybe not as paranoid as web2py" > or just "Maybe not as much as web2py". > > A few other typos: > - Should be "31 validators" (i.e., plural) > - "named after the HTML elements they represent" (i.e., add "the") > - "first applications written for the web2py framework" (i.e., add > "the") -- or maybe just "first applications written using web2py". > - Should be "JSONRPC" not "JSONPRC".
Thanks, everyone for corrections. > Also, I'm wondering about the claim that "Most frameworks are better > suited for classic content sites" (rather than "web applications"). Is > that really true these days? It seems that most frameworks are > described as building "applications" (not just content sites). Maybe > "application" is too general or vague in this context. Perhaps the > relevant distinction has more to do with facilitating some specific > aspects of web app development, like AJAX, web services, GAE, etc. That's something I keep hearing from my mentor, actually. At least regarding AJAX support. Anyway, I'll keep it that way. Some will definitely find it true. -- Branko Vukelić [email protected] [email protected] Check out my blog: http://www.brankovukelic.com/ Check out my portfolio: http://www.flickr.com/photos/foxbunny/ Registered Linux user #438078 (http://counter.li.org/) I hang out on identi.ca: http://identi.ca/foxbunny Gimp Brushmakers Guild http://bit.ly/gbg-group
