On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Anthony <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, LGPL (I think) allows the exception to distribute the source along with > an application that links/imports the source. I was talking about the other > web2py exception, which allows distribution of the binaries without the > source at all (i.e., the freeware license for the binaries). Currently, we
Why? I don't think it would be too much to ask companies to pay for binary-only bundling. If you can distribute with the sources (meaning either put sources in the bundle, or offer sources some other way, mind you), why not? I have absolutely nothing against that. If a company is not prepared to do that, they should use a closed-source product that allows this. -- Branko Vukelić [email protected] [email protected] Check out my blog: http://www.brankovukelic.com/ Check out my portfolio: http://www.flickr.com/photos/foxbunny/ Registered Linux user #438078 (http://counter.li.org/) I hang out on identi.ca: http://identi.ca/foxbunny Gimp Brushmakers Guild http://bit.ly/gbg-group
