The problem is, it would break backward compatibility. On Wednesday, July 13, 2011 12:54:57 AM UTC-4, Rahul wrote:
> Its true that there are existing python versions 2.6, 2.7.x but what I > would like is Web2py support for Python 3. > Reasons: > 1. We should provide early support for Python 3 (regardless of what > wsgi standard it will provide) because it may trigger a lot of python > users to adopt Web2py as it might be the ONLY Full Stack Framework > that will be supporting Python 3 > 2. Python 3.x is the future of Python (I see this to be very true) > Eventually we would all be using Python 3.x in our production > systems. > 3. Lets progress rather than remaining stagnant with existing versions > of Python only. I mean Why Not the latest Python ?? > > Cheers, Rahul D > > > On Jul 12, 5:38 pm, pbreit <pbreit...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I suspect 2.6 is going to be popular for some time since that's what's in > > > the current Ubuntu LTS (10.04).
