Never heard of it before.
On Sep 8, 11:01 am, António Ramos <[email protected]> wrote: > does the [email protected] still exists? > > What do they have about the new admin they talked about months ago? > > 2011/9/8 Massimo Di Pierro <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > This is a problem indeed. > > > Anyway, I think it would be a good idea to have a convention about > > icons representing apps. Listing all the apps publicly does not belong > > in welcome and it is a security hazard. there could be a public page > > in admin that does that and admin can be disabled anyway. > > > On Sep 8, 8:45 am, Richard Vézina <[email protected]> wrote: > > > But the idea of António is pretty nice... > > > > Only one problem, the speed of development web2py seems to generate > > obsolete > > > code in the applications published that force Massimo to launch adopt an > > App > > > movement... I don't know if it as work until now... I think this should > > be > > > fixed first, I mean make evolve the published apps at the same rythm of > > > evolution than web2py... > > > > Richard > > > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Anthony <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > The 'welcome' app is intended to be a scaffolding upon which to build > > an > > > > app. The app selector you suggest might be more appropriate for > > inclusion in > > > > the 'admin' app (where the 'welcome' app could be one of the choices). > > > > > On Thursday, September 8, 2011 5:18:42 AM UTC-4, Ramos wrote: > > > > >> I think the welcome app should be for users to see all apps available > > > >> i would like to see an welcome app like the attached file > > > >> All apps are associated with an icon for easy remembering > > > > >> António > > > > >> 2011/9/8 pbreit <[email protected]> > > > > >> I certainly would not call it useless. It provides a bit of > > information > > > >>> about how pages get rendered as well as some useful links. > > > > >>> Do you have any suggestions for how to improve?
