Hi Sententia,

Welcome. A few thoughts below...

I was wondering if someone from this user group could give a practical 
> and straight response about the future development of this framework 
> and it's ability to be flexible?
>

Could you be a little more specific? What do you want to know about future 
development, and what do you mean by being "flexible"? Development of 
web2py is very active (typically multiple commits per day, and a new 
release about once a month). It has been developed for over four years, has 
an active and passionate user community, and a large number of 
contributors, so I'm sure it will be under active development for a long 
time to come. It's also very open and fairly informal, so if you have ideas 
and want to get involved, it's very easy to make contributions yourself.
 

> I've spoken on the IRCs 
> and asked a few people and they have shot web2py down quite heavily.
>

I don't know what was said in those particular chats or who was involved, 
but I have seen that kind of talk in other places. In my experience, most 
of it is FUD, and those spreading it typically have never actually used 
web2py. In many cases, they themselves have some kind of stake in 
alternative frameworks. When challenged to provide evidence or details, 
they often disappear from the conversation. 

To be sure, web2py does do some things differently from other Python 
frameworks. In particular, it is willing to forego some (mostly unhelpful) 
"explicitness" in favor of making development quicker and easier. Without 
ever trying web2py, some "Pythonistas" imagine that this causes all kinds 
of trouble, but they ignore the evidence of thousands of happy users who 
are not in fact experiencing these hypothetical problems in actual real 
world usage.

Anyway, if you want to discuss any particular criticisms you have heard, 
we'd be happy to weigh in.
 

> If I know the framework which I'm going to use is flexible with a 
> bright future, I can add my extensions to work with it and know that 
> it wont be a dead end.
>

I don't think you'll have to worry about that with web2py. I think you'll 
also find the web2py community to be a particularly welcoming and helpful 
one.
 

> Also, why is there 14 people in #web2py but 149 people #pyramid? Why 
> is a framework which is so known, so unfollowed?
>

For whatever reason, web2py folks tend not to be big on IRC and instead 
primarily come to this forum for discussion and support. Note, the web2py 
Google group (which is growing steadily) has 30% more members than the 
Pyramid group and posts nearly 10 times as many messages -- so I think 
overall our community is probably even more active. Also, web2py was 
recently rated best among six Python web 
frameworks<http://www.infoworld.com/d/application-development/pillars-python-six-python-web-frameworks-compared-169442>by
 InfoWorld, and received an InfoWorld Bossie 
Award<http://www.infoworld.com/d/open-source-software/bossie-awards-2011-the-best-open-source-application-development-software-171759-0&current=10&last=9#slideshowTop>for
 best open source development software.

Hope that helps.

Best Regards,
Anthony

Reply via email to