+1
On Feb 5, 3:20 pm, Simon Lukell <[email protected]> wrote: > As a 'bystander', I personally think that Niphlod's response is of > such good quality that the gist of it deserves inclusion in the book.
+1
On Feb 5, 3:20 pm, Simon Lukell <[email protected]> wrote: > As a 'bystander', I personally think that Niphlod's response is of > such good quality that the gist of it deserves inclusion in the book.