Maybe we should create another label such as "production" or "GA" vs latest (instead of "nightly build"). "production" becomes latest after no major bugs are found for a 5 days. The name change also encourage testing "latest"... on could feel more comfortable at first sight.
mic Il 05 marzo 2012 23:27, Massimo Di Pierro <[email protected]> ha scritto: > we do. We have the nightly build and we do post release candidates in > advance. The problem is that not many people test it. > > > On Monday, 5 March 2012 12:31:49 UTC-6, spiffytech wrote: >> >> Have you considered publishing release candidates ~1 week ahead of a >> release, to allow early-adopters to upgrade and see what's broken, >> rather than having the rapid stream of releases? I saw you said "I'm >> releasing 1.99.5 tomorrow, please test it today", but that's rather a >> short and informal testing cycle. >> >> >> On Mar 4, 5:29 pm, Massimo Di Pierro <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Same as 1.99.5 and 1.99.6 but should solve all the outstanding >> > compatibility issues. >> > >> > Massimo
