On Thursday, April 5, 2012 11:49:43 AM UTC-4, Richard wrote: > > I wasn't know I could do that...
Yes, in that case you're not caching the Rows object, you're just caching a dict that you create from the Rows object -- dicts are cacheable. Anthony
On Thursday, April 5, 2012 11:49:43 AM UTC-4, Richard wrote: > > I wasn't know I could do that...
Yes, in that case you're not caching the Rows object, you're just caching a dict that you create from the Rows object -- dicts are cacheable. Anthony