Thanks Anthony, I think it improves speed, I will know more precisely when I push a update on my prod server.
Richard On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Anthony <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thursday, April 5, 2012 11:49:43 AM UTC-4, Richard wrote: >> >> I wasn't know I could do that... > > > Yes, in that case you're not caching the Rows object, you're just caching > a dict that you create from the Rows object -- dicts are cacheable. > > Anthony >
