Yeah, I am not sure how well web2py can handle load but I am going to find out pretty fast. I finished setting up a load balancer today, going to have 3 servers under it running nginx + uwsgi + web2py a single dedicated DB server for now, but figure I am going to need some slave read only servers. The speed at which web2py allows you to develop applications will surpass any load issues, well unless it could only handle 50,000 users/per second then that would be a big issue :D
My one concern is how good the sticky sessions on linode's nodebalancer works. Regarding uwsgi I have ready time out issues when using it with web2py. -- Regards, Bruce On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 9:55 PM, pbreit <[email protected]> wrote: > I've never read anything but good things about uwsgi. Django and Flask > both promote it. -- -- Regards, Bruce Wade http://ca.linkedin.com/in/brucelwade http://www.wadecybertech.com http://www.fittraineronline.com - Fitness Personal Trainers Online http://www.warplydesigned.com
