Ok got it running, restarted uwsgi not sure what the issue was. However following the guides I my static content isn't being loaded: http://50.116.6.124
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Bruce Wade <[email protected]> wrote: > uwsgi is sure not as easy to get working correctly as apache is. Keep > getting the following: > 2012/04/18 10:44:49 [error] 23686#0: *8454 upstream prematurely closed > connection while reading response header from upstream, client: > 173.180.212.86, server: youadstage, request: "GET / HTTP/1.1", upstream: > "uwsgi://127.0.0.1:9001", host: "50.116.6.124" > > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Bruno Rocha <[email protected]>wrote: > >> There are directions for this on book >> http://web2py.com/books/default/chapter/29/4#session >> >> Store session on db or set separate=True >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Bruno Rocha <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> I recommend you to store sessions on db or cache like memcached, >>> redis... If you are going to run in a load balance, sessions in disk will >>> be a problem. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Bruce Wade <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Currently FS >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Bruno Rocha <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Are you storing sessions in db or FS? >>>>> >>>>> http://zerp.ly/rochacbruno >>>>> Em 18/04/2012 02:18, "Bruce Wade" <[email protected]> escreveu: >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, I am not sure how well web2py can handle load but I am going to >>>>>> find out pretty fast. I finished setting up a load balancer today, going >>>>>> to >>>>>> have 3 servers under it running nginx + uwsgi + web2py a single dedicated >>>>>> DB server for now, but figure I am going to need some slave read only >>>>>> servers. The speed at which web2py allows you to develop applications >>>>>> will surpass any load issues, well unless it could only handle 50,000 >>>>>> users/per second then that would be a big issue :D >>>>>> >>>>>> My one concern is how good the sticky sessions on linode's >>>>>> nodebalancer works. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regarding uwsgi I have ready time out issues when using it with >>>>>> web2py. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Bruce >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 9:55 PM, pbreit <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I've never read anything but good things about uwsgi. Django and >>>>>>> Flask both promote it. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Bruce Wade >>>>>> http://ca.linkedin.com/in/brucelwade >>>>>> http://www.wadecybertech.com >>>>>> http://www.fittraineronline.com - Fitness Personal Trainers Online >>>>>> http://www.warplydesigned.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> -- >>>> Regards, >>>> Bruce Wade >>>> http://ca.linkedin.com/in/brucelwade >>>> http://www.wadecybertech.com >>>> http://www.fittraineronline.com - Fitness Personal Trainers Online >>>> http://www.warplydesigned.com >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Bruno Rocha >>> [http://rochacbruno.com.br] >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> Bruno Rocha >> [http://rochacbruno.com.br] >> >> > > > -- > -- > Regards, > Bruce Wade > http://ca.linkedin.com/in/brucelwade > http://www.wadecybertech.com > http://www.fittraineronline.com - Fitness Personal Trainers Online > http://www.warplydesigned.com > > -- -- Regards, Bruce Wade http://ca.linkedin.com/in/brucelwade http://www.wadecybertech.com http://www.fittraineronline.com - Fitness Personal Trainers Online http://www.warplydesigned.com
