On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 08:54:29 +0200 "Roberto De Ioris" <robe...@unbit.it> wrote:
> By the way, it is pretty strange you found 'threading' support a > uwsgi-blocker as very few (maybe 3-4, uWSGI included) production-grade > WSGI servers seriously supports them (with mod_wsgi having the better > implementation for sure). What method/server would you recommend for running few smaller low-traffic web2py-powered sites on a host which allows me to use 100MB & 50 processes, iow. memory is the bottleneck? I'm looking into uwsgi, but wonder if there is something better memory-wise? Sincererly, Gour
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
