On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 11:29:09 +0200 Roberto De Ioris <robe...@unbit.it> wrote:
> I am the one you are already talking about it on irc :) Ohh, you're the uwsgi author? I thought you're using 'unbit' nick. :-) > By the way uWSGI is for sure the one consuming less memory (in > relation to features you get) in the group of preforking/multithreaded > servers. That's great to hear. > You can even rebuild it removing all of the unneeded features. Even cooler. > It is built expecially for shared hosting with limited > processes/threads and memory so you will find options to limit its > memory or to trigger reload on specific conditions (or exceptions). Wonderful. So, you mean using just uwsgi? > Obviously it has a very high learning curve, so be prepared for some > headache (but it will payback for sure). OK, np. > Another popular solution (in pure python this time) is gunicorn, it > is in the spirit "do only one thing, do it well", so from a > programmer point of view it is a lot more appealing than uWSGI (that > is sysadmins-oriented). It has no threads support, so you have to > rely on processes and some external tool if you want to > monitor/manage your app. I'll take a look. Thanks for the pointer, although uwsgi sounds more appropriate. Sincerely, Gour -- One who restrains his senses, keeping them under full control, and fixes his consciousness upon Me, is known as a man of steady intelligence. http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
