I tried ROR. As a relative noob to both Python and Ruby I will testify that Python allows much more concise and readable code. This means less typing and easier debugging.
This means, in turn, that the time from project start to final payment checkpoint is shorter and the ongoing maintenance burden is less. Over time, the ongoing maintenance burden is the higher cost. On Friday, July 6, 2012 1:58:36 AM UTC-4, murtaza52 wrote: > > Hi, > > I am considering three frameworks for developing our commercial > applications- > > 1) web2py (choice #1) > 2) ROR > 3) Play framework > > While my research I was intrigued by Massimo's post where he says that he > would pick ROR over any of the current python frameworks. My question is > how does web2py itself compare to ROR ? What are the views of those > experienced with both the ecosystems ? > > http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/209343 > > I have expereince with none so will rely on your answers :) The purpose of > the question is not to start a flame war, but to understand why should > web2py be chose over other frameworks which have much more traction today? > > Thanks, > Murtaza > >
