What about "Checked" ? Thanks, Calin
-----Original Message----- From: Paul Eggleton [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 5:03 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Otavio Salvador; Barros Pena, Belen; Dragomir, CalinX L; Zhang, Jessica Subject: Re: [Webhob] task types and outcomes On Friday 31 May 2013 10:53:43 Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Barros Pena, Belen < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > On 30/05/2013 15:21, "Richard Purdie" > > <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > >> So for the 'all tasks' table, we could have a 'task type' column > > >> classifying tasks as 'executed' and 'not executed'. > > > > > >I'd prefer "Prebuilt" than "not executed" but yes. > > > > Prebuilt sounds good to me, but it causes a bit of a naming issue. > > We have identified 3 possible 'Outcomes' for prebuilt tasks: sstate, > > skipped and previously built (tasks for which an stamp file exists). > > 'Prebuilt' and 'Previously built' are too similar, which is bound to cause > > confusion. > > > > Does any of you have any ideas for a better name for the 'Previously > > built' outcome? > > What about 'Cached'? That clashes with the sstate "cache". Not that I have any better suggestion... Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ webhob mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/webhob
