I've updated the Django models information based on this. The outcome is now limited only to these five options discussed. Please find my changes here: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Django_models
Thanks, Calin -----Original Message----- From: Barros Pena, Belen Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 1:40 PM To: Dragomir, CalinX L; Paul Eggleton; [email protected] Cc: Zhang, Jessica; Damian, Alexandru Subject: Re: [Webhob] task types and outcomes On 03/06/2013 13:32, "Barros Pena, Belen" <[email protected]> wrote: >So we have 'cached' and 'checked' so far. What about 'reused', >'recycled', 'restored' or something along those lines? Paul Eggleton has suggested 'existing', so I think I'll use that for the time being. If anybody has a better term, let me know. Belen > >Belen > >On 31/05/2013 15:04, "Dragomir, CalinX L" <[email protected]> >wrote: > >>What about "Checked" ? >> >>Thanks, >>Calin >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Paul Eggleton [mailto:[email protected]] >>Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 5:03 PM >>To: [email protected] >>Cc: Otavio Salvador; Barros Pena, Belen; Dragomir, CalinX L; Zhang, >>Jessica >>Subject: Re: [Webhob] task types and outcomes >> >>On Friday 31 May 2013 10:53:43 Otavio Salvador wrote: >>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Barros Pena, Belen < >>> >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> > On 30/05/2013 15:21, "Richard Purdie" >>> > <[email protected]> >>> > >>> > wrote: >>> > >> So for the 'all tasks' table, we could have a 'task type' >>> > >> column classifying tasks as 'executed' and 'not executed'. >>> > > >>> > >I'd prefer "Prebuilt" than "not executed" but yes. >>> > >>> > Prebuilt sounds good to me, but it causes a bit of a naming issue. >>> > We have identified 3 possible 'Outcomes' for prebuilt tasks: >>> > sstate, skipped and previously built (tasks for which an stamp file >>> > exists). >>> > 'Prebuilt' and 'Previously built' are too similar, which is bound >>> > to >>>cause confusion. >>> > >>> > Does any of you have any ideas for a better name for the >>> > 'Previously built' outcome? >>> >>> What about 'Cached'? >> >>That clashes with the sstate "cache". Not that I have any better >>suggestion... >> >>Cheers, >>Paul >> >>-- >> >>Paul Eggleton >>Intel Open Source Technology Centre > _______________________________________________ webhob mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/webhob
