On Jun 14, 2008, at 10:36 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > I would prefer if we keep a JS prefix only on the objects that seem > like very generic names otherwise.
Makes sense. Given that rule of thumb, what do you think of these: "GetterSetterImp" => "JSGetterSetter", "NumberImp" => "JSNumberCell", "StringImp" => "JSString", "ArrayInstance" => "JSArray", "FunctionImp" => "JSFunction", Do all of those deserve the JS prefix? Maybe the first three and not the last two? > Another thought that came up is that perhaps we should change our > namespace from KJS to JSC. I like the idea. But I'm not crazy about the three WebKit namespaces being WTF, JSC, and WebCore. One of these things is not like the others! -- Darin _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev