thx for your helpful answer, michael, and this implementation's difference caused the current qtwebkit can only get 96 point from acid 3 test, but gtkwebkit can pass all the test, although they shared a same core, right?
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Michael Seydl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > exactly. the "logical" (html and dom stuff) part remains the same the only > differ in there "platform"-dependend implementations (e.g. drawing and > networking-code). > > This also implicates that different implementation does not always > guarantee > that they show the excact same behavior when rendering a page, if that's > what > you are up to. > > Greets, > mingy > > On Tuesday 08 July 2008 11:04:17 you wrote: > > so that means, even though the user agent string is different from > qtwebkit > > and gtkwebkit, but they still share the same webkit core, right? > > > > On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Michael Seydl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > On Tuesday 08 July 2008 10:26:35 you wrote: > > > > hi all, > > > > > > > > the same situation here, no flash or multimedia support. and there > are > > > > other things that I find out pretty interesting. > > > > > > > > the qtwebkit HTTP_USER_AGENT ist like the following > > > > Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux; en-US) AppleWebKit/523.15 (KHTML, like > > > > Gecko, Safari/419.3) QtLauncher/0.1 > > > > > > > > but the same webkit nightly tarball built with gtkwebkit, it has the > > > > following string > > > > > > The construction of the user-agent string happens in > > > QWebPage::userAgentForUrl(const QUrl& url). The function's > implementation > > > of > > > the webkit used in the Qt 4.4.0 snapshot differs from the one in the > > > repo. > > > > > > Ofc it's possible to override this function and supply one's own > string. > > > > > > Greets, > > > Michael > > > > > > > "Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; zh-cn) > AppleWebKit/525.1+ > > > > (KHTML, like Gecko, Safari/525.1+)" > > > > > > > > greets > > > > > > > > Ye > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Michael Seydl < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > > > Not sure if qtwebkit has nspluginapi support yet, but I don't think > > > > > so. > > > > > > > > > > Greets, > > > > > Michael > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday 08 July 2008 08:39:23 leslie lige wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > is it possible to play flash in a webkit browser under x86-Linux > ? > > > > > > how > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > do that? > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm trying to use Qt 4.4.0 's demo browser, but I can't find any > > > > > > suitable flashplayer plugin for it. > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks & with regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Leslie > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > > > > Connect to the next generation of MSN Messenger > > > > > > > http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/default.aspx?locale=en-us&sourc > > > > > > > >e= > > > > > > > > > > >wlmailtagline _______________________________________________ > > > > > > webkit-dev mailing list > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > webkit-dev mailing list > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev > > >
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
