On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 10:47 -0700, Peter Kasting wrote: > Your comment in that bug was that it was 3.7% of CPU on your machine. > 3.7% for "as fast as possible" doesn't seem like a huge burden. That > suggests authors could write tight loops at 3ms delays and still only > burn 10% of the CPU. I think that's a reasonable proposal.
I would rather not have my CPU burning at 10% if I'm running on battery. Even waking up the processor that many times sound bad enough. Perhaps allow the application to set the clamp (or a higher level policy) would do good for cases in which power saving is being considered critical? See you, -- Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GNOME contributor: http://www.gnome.org/ _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
