On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Peter Kasting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 04:03:32PM -0700, Mike Belshe wrote: >> > Total size Potential savings >> > www.cnn.com: 43M >> 410Kwww.facebook.com: >> > 43M 408K >> > www.slashdot.org: 36M 208K >> > m.ext.google.com: 45M 475K >> > docs (normal doc): 42M 341K >> > docs (big spreadsheet): 55M 905K >> > maps: 38M 159K >> >> It would be interesting to have the figures on 64-bit systems. > > > Why would it be different, since WebKit is (AFAIK) always compiled in > 32-bit mode? Or is it 64-bit compat now? > WebKit compiles just fine in 64-bit. We even shiped it 32/64 fat on Leopard. -Sam
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
