I think this is a great way to distinguish bugs. I just posted on chromium-dev recommending this.
:DG< On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Maciej Stachowiak<[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jun 19, 2009, at 11:05 AM, Drew Wilson wrote: > > I absolutely understand that there are ways to proactively find reviewers, > and I'm *not* complaining about the time being taken (I understand the > constraints that most of the webkit reviewers have been under the last few > weeks with WWDC, etc). As you say, we can always ping people on IRC to find > reviewers for bugfixes. > I was more specifically wondering if there was something about this patch > that made it not show up on the list Eric provided below. My concern is > because the bugfix came from a google.com address, it might have been > getting lumped in with the "oh, must be Yet Another Chromium Patch so I > won't worry about it" list, which if true has troubling implications given > that there are an increasing number of Googlers that are making > contributions to WebKit that have nothing to do with Chromium. > > I try to tag Chromium-specific bugs with [Chromium] in the bug title when I > go through the review queue, and I know others do as well, so from the fact > that this bug is not so tagged you can assume we are aware it is a > cross-platform fix. > - Maciej > > -atw > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:51 AM, David Levin <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Drew, if you go to http://nightly.webkit.org/start/, then click "Patches >> awaiting Review". >> That is the list folks work off of, but it doesn't hurt to figure out the >> appropriate person to review the patch (find out who has changed the file a >> lot) and ping them in irc to see if they can get to it. >> Dave >> >> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Drew Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I note that this bug fix: >>> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23721 >>> ...was not on the list below, and has been waiting for some reviewer love >>> for a couple of weeks now. Is it falling through the cracks somehow? >>> -atw >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Andrei Popescu <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:03 AM, Eric Seidel<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > The other 24 remaining patches consist of 6 Gtk patches, 3 Chromium >>>> > patches, and a bunch of huge new feature patches. >>>> > >>>> >>>> No quite. The following two are rather small patches to common code >>>> (appcache and database): >>>> >>>> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22700 >>>> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25711 >>>> >>>> I think Alexey promised to look at them. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Andrei >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> webkit-dev mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> webkit-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev > > _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
