The Surfin' Safari blog seems to have fairly wide readership in the web dev community. Google Reader reports 35k Reader subscribers. For comparison: blog.chromium.org has 17k and blog.mozilla.com has 10k. However, the last post with descriptive content was back on April 18th. Since that post, we've written 8 "X is a now a WebKit reviewer" posts. One recent commenter said:
*"I don’t suppose there’s anything more interesting going on in WebKit land worth blogging about, is there? So-and-so is a new WebKit reviewer isn’t nearly as interesting as whatever new hotness is coming down the pipe. And I know I’m not the only one who thinks so… Feel like blogging about WebKit awesomeness?"* I propose we increase the amount of blogging about WebKit awesomeness by changing the tradition for new reviewer posts. Instead of defaulting to: * So-and-so is now a WebKit reviewer* * Posted by Someone-else So-and-so has worked on awesome-feature or awesome-infrastructure...* We encourage (or just allow?) a format more like: * How awesome-infrastructure works* * Posted by So-and-so, the latest WebKit reviewer Here's my description of how awesome-infrastructure works in WebKit...* * * * -OR- * * ** Awesome-feature is the new hotness* * Posted by So-and-so, the latest WebKit reviewer Web developers can now use awesome-feature. Here's how it works...* Thoughts? -Tony
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
