Isn't ref counting supposed to be _really_ optimized for exactly this use? It seems like a good match--unless you have major issues with cycles...which might be the issue?
J On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Kenneth Russell <k...@google.com> wrote: > I would be happy to not add another Arena client, but the primary > reason I need an arena is not just for performance but to avoid having > to keep track of all of the objects I need to delete. > > Is there any consensus yet on how to proceed with > https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45059 ? I'm concerned about > taking on large-scale restructuring with potential performance impact > as a prerequisite for my landing any initial code. I could revert my > PODArena class to use its own memory allocation rather than that in > Arena.h. > > -Ken > > On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 7:12 PM, David Hyatt <hy...@apple.com> wrote: > > Please let's not add another client of Arena though. That will just make > it harder to remove, and I highly doubt you're getting any real performance > gain from using it. > > > > dave > > > > _______________________________________________ > > webkit-dev mailing list > > firstname.lastname@example.org > > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > email@example.com > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev >
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev