Here's a change that I felt worth getting someone to glance at but didn't feel worth the overhead of a bug: http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/81305
Since I was gardener and this was affecting the bots, it was a timely situation. (Sometimes getting in your fix right before another break comes in is important in these cases.) dave PS Dmitry found a flaw in my original change log text -- due to my haste, I originally had put in the wrong valgrind error. On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Jeremy Orlow <jor...@chromium.org> wrote: > Can you please explain why? Its very little overhead and is useful for > tracking regressions and such. > > J > On Mar 28, 2011 9:52 AM, "Darin Adler" <da...@apple.com> wrote: > > On Mar 27, 2011, at 1:31 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: > > > >> I'd even go a bit further and say that if something is worth a review > (even if it's over the shoulder), it's worth a bug + a bug number. > > > > This is where I do not agree. Review is a requirement, but I don’t think > bugs.webkit.org should be. > > > > -- Darin > > > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev > >
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
