Is that a good example? It doesn't remind me much of the ORWT output. The disclosure triangles don't seem to do anything for hte failures on that page.
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Ojan Vafai <o...@chromium.org> wrote: > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Adam Roben <aro...@apple.com> wrote: >> >> On May 3, 2011, at 4:01 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote: >> >> The results load considerably faster now. For runs where many tests fail, >> the filesize is considerably smaller than the >> old-run-webkit-tests filesize. Also, I've added in the image toggling >> behavior of old-run-webkit-tests and made the aesthetics a bit closer to the >> old-run-webkit-test format. >> Some rough file sizes if you care about the details. >> old-run-webkit-tests 5 failures: 5k >> old-run-webkit-tests 500 failures: 250k >> new-run-webkit-tests 5 failures: 1k json + 25k htmljs >> new-run-webkit-tests 500 failures: 60k json + 25k html/js >> >> Thanks for all the work you've put into this, Ojan! Is there a link we can >> use to look at the latest and greatest? > > http://build.chromium.org/f/chromium/layout_test_results/Webkit_Linux/results/layout-test-results/results.html > Disclaimer: The json file loaded on that page is much larger (~90x) than the > non-Chromium equivalent would be because Chromium runs tests expected to > fail. > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev > > _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
