Functional? Regards, Tim.
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Darin Adler <[email protected]> wrote: > On May 12, 2011, at 11:33 AM, David Levin wrote: > > Layout/ # Would be nice to have a better name since these test much >> more than Layout >> > > DumpRenderTreeTests? > Integration? > AutomatedHtmlTests? > > > Here are some characteristics of these tests that may help us name the > directory: > > 1) This is the primary suite of WebKit tests. > 2) These tests are all automated. > 3) These tests all include an expected result (broadly including future > addition of reftests). > 4) These tests are regression tests; most are designed to catch any > changes in behavior, not just detect failure. > 5) These tests consist of HTML or SVG markup, with CSS and JavaScript, > much like webpages in the wild. > 6) Most of these tests can also be run by opening them in a web > browser. > 7) Most of these tests are designed to test end-to-end, although some > are more like unit tests. > > I don’t think they should be named after DumpRenderTree because that name > is itself a misnomer. > > I think that (7) above does fit with the name Integration, but that name > still doesn’t work so well for me. > > Despite (5) above I don’t love the idea of having HTML in the name when we > can accommodate SVG tests too. > > -- Darin > > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev > >
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
