On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Adam Barth <[email protected]> wrote: > These changes might increase the number of image baselines we store in > the tree for "chromium-mac"-derived ports (because there will be fewer > redundant fallback paths), but I expect that cost to be relatively > small because essentially every port has different image baselines > anyway.
I like this idea, in general. However, since some ports (GTK+ and EFL, for instance) shares the same backends (Cairo, FontConfig, Pango, etc.), pixel tests are often the same. So, to minimize the size and maintenance effort of the LayoutTests, I think it would be a good idea to have baselines for the backends, with fallbacks for the ports. This of course wouldn't be a fallback tree, but would be simpler than what we currently have. OTOH, I'm not sure if this would help ports other than the ones mentioned. Comments? Leandro _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
