I think it would look the same, except for instead of monotonically increasing decimal numbers in the "revision" column, you'd see random hexadecimal ones (typically 6-8 digits long).
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Lucas Forschler <lforsch...@apple.com> wrote: > Could someone enlighten me on what this page would look like after a > conversion to git? > > http://build.webkit.org/builders/Windows%20Debug%20%28Build%29?numbuilds=100 > > Lucas > > On Mar 8, 2012, at 3:22 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 2:37 PM, David Barr <davidb...@google.com> wrote: >>> The monotonic labels that Ryosuke desires are known in git language as >>> "generation numbers". If we maintain a canonical linear history going >>> forward, they would also be unique as with Subversion. This could be a >>> good reason to resurrect the relevant thread on the git mailing list. >>> >> >> slightly-offtopic, but I had not heard of "generation numbers" before. >> Based on a cursory web-learning pass (*), it sounds like they're not >> quite the same thing as SVN revisions, since SVN revision numers are >> unique to a repo, and two revisions on two different branches may have >> the same generation number. Since we do actually keep branches in the >> master repo, this wouldn't quite be the same (although it might >> possibly be acceptable). Please correct me if I'm wrong ... >> >> -- Dirk >> >> (*) http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6702821/git-commit-generation-numbers >> _______________________________________________ >> webkit-dev mailing list >> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org >> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev